Idaho Supreme Court· 6/20/1985

Carter v. State

Citations

702 P.2d 826
108 Idaho 788
1985 Ida. LEXIS 502

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that defendant must show: (1) that counsel’s performance was deficient, and (2) that counsel’s errors prejudiced the defense
recognizing that defendant must show: (1) that counsel's performance was deficient, and (2) that counsel's errors prejudiced the defense
holding that counsel’s failure to move to suppress the defendant’s confession constituted ineffective assistance because it was obvious that the confession would have been suppressed
stating “inexplicable” failure to move to suppress evidence constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel because it was obvious that statements would have been suppressed
Article I, § 13 of the Idaho Constitution also requires that a criminal defendant be afforded the assistance of counsel
Article I, § 13 of the Idaho Constitution also requires that a criminal defendant be afforded the assistance of counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Donaldson, Shepard, Huntley, McFadden, Bakes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.