Idaho Supreme Court· 6/9/1999
State v. Nunez
Citations
- 981 P.2d 738
- 133 Idaho 13
- 1999 Ida. LEXIS 68
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a district court did not err in deciding not to instruct the jury that it must unanimously agree on the underlying act giving rise to a misuse of public monies charge
- noting that where the jury was instructed to consider each count separately, this Court presumes that instruction was followed
- noting that where the jury was instructed to consider each count separately, this Court presumes that instruction was followed
- stating that in order to prove violation of Idaho RICO statute, plaintiff must prove existence of “enterprise” connected to “pattern of racketeering activity”
- noting that where the jury was instructed to consider each count separately, this Court presumes that instruction was followed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnson, Schroeder, Silak, Tern, Trout, Walters
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SeversonIdaho Supreme Court· 2009-05-29· cited 298×
- Leavitt v. AraveNinth Circuit· 2004-09-07· cited 182×
- State v. AdamcikIdaho Supreme Court· 2012-01-25· cited 161×
- State v. JonesHawaii Supreme Court· 2001-08-30· cited 70×
- Clark v. KleinIdaho Supreme Court· 2002-03-05· cited 52×
- Leavitt v. AraveNinth Circuit· 2004-06-14· cited 45×
- Hoyle v. Ada CountyNinth Circuit· 2007-08-02· cited 31×
- State v. James Leroy SkunkcapIdaho Supreme Court· 2014-09-15· cited 21×
- State v. Tami Marie SouthwickIdaho Court of Appeals· 2014-12-03· cited 20×
- State v. HickmanIdaho Supreme Court· 2008-04-25· cited 18×
- Zazzali v. Hirschler Fleischer, P.C.D. Delaware· 2012-08-21· cited 18×
- Doe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court· 2010-06-28· cited 15×
- State v. GriffithIdaho Court of Appeals· 2007-03-07· cited 14×
- State v. Al-KotraniIdaho Supreme Court· 2005-01-28· cited 12×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 2004-06-14· cited 1×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 2004-09-07
- Re: Termination of parental rightsIdaho Supreme Court· 2010-06-28
- State v. Torey Michael AdamcikIdaho Supreme Court· 2011-11-29
- State v. James Leroy SkunkcapIdaho Supreme Court· 2014-06-17
- Hoyle v. Ada CountyNinth Circuit· 2007-08-01
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1943-01-18· cited 1,702×
- Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 1,454×
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court· 1993-03-03· cited 1,166×
- McKoy v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1990-03-05· cited 1,045×
- National Organization for Women, Inc. v. ScheidlerSupreme Court· 1994-01-24· cited 661×
- State v. ZichkoIdaho Supreme Court· 1996-07-29· cited 472×
- Russell v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 1990-07-03· cited 216×
- United States v. Rex C. Cauble, Individually and Doing Business as Cauble EnterprisesFifth Circuit· 1983-08-11· cited 210×
- United States v. Jannotti, Harry P. Schwartz, George X. Appeal of Harry P. Jannotti, in No. 83-1093. Appeal of George X. Schwartz, in No. 83-1094Third Circuit· 1984-03-20· cited 162×
- United States v. Anthony M. Scotto and Anthony AnastasioSecond Circuit· 1980-09-02· cited 155×
- Granite Investment Co. v. Federal Savings & Loan InsuranceSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 140×
- United States v. WebsterFourth Circuit· 1981-01-15· cited 112×
- United States v. Nunzio Provenzano, in 81-2411. Appeal of Irving Cotler, in 81-2412Third Circuit· 1982-09-27· cited 106×
- United States v. Edward D. PopeNinth Circuit· 1988-03-09· cited 104×
- State v. BeasonIdaho Supreme Court· 1973-03-01· cited 95×
- Davis v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 1989-07-25· cited 83×
- State v. AbelIdaho Supreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 62×
- State v. WardIdaho Supreme Court· 1977-09-28· cited 59×
- United States v. FieldS.D. New York· 1977-04-22· cited 54×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.