D. Nevada· 1/23/2009
Carstarphen v. Milsner
Citations
- 594 F. Supp. 2d 1201
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9720
- 2009 WL 223923
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- district courts need not address “the merits of issues first raised in a reply, as the opposing party is not afforded any opportunity to respond”
- district courts need not address “the merits of issues first raised in a reply, as the opposing party is not afforded any opportunity to respond”
- rebutting the fear of successive litigation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reed
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Loveland Essential Group, LLC v. Grommon Farms, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2012-02-02· cited 28×
- 7912 Limbwood Court Trust v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.D. Nevada· 2013-10-28· cited 16×
- Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n v. SaboD. Oregon· 2012-03-30· cited 4×
- Searcy v. Esurance Insurance Co.D. Nevada· 2017-03-17· cited 1×
- City Parkway V, Inc. v. Union Pacific RailroadD. Nevada· 2012-12-04· cited 1×
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 5,583×
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court· 2005-03-30· cited 4,974×
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesNinth Circuit· 2001-05-04· cited 2,421×
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 2003-08-26· cited 2,266×
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USANinth Circuit· 2003-01-31· cited 1,078×
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court· 1955-06-06· cited 1,049×
- Semegen v. WeidnerNinth Circuit· 1985-09-24· cited 476×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1996-07-17· cited 412×
- Nano Maldonado v. Tony Harris, in His Capacity as Acting Director of the California Department of TransportationNinth Circuit· 2004-06-04· cited 395×
- James Odom v. Microsoft Corporation, a Washington Corporation Best Buy Co., Inc., a Minnesota CorporationNinth Circuit· 2007-05-04· cited 360×
- Jane Doe v. Allied-Signal, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1993-02-09· cited 332×
- Melissa Rawe Thomas J. Rawe Kimberly Rawe v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company Cynthia HoltcampSixth Circuit· 2006-09-01· cited 230×
- Five Star Capital Corp. v. RubyNevada Supreme Court· 2008-10-30· cited 185×
- Havercombe v. Department of Education of Puerto RicoFirst Circuit· 2001-05-16· cited 161×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1996-12-20· cited 159×
- Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.Second Circuit· 1997-09-25· cited 138×
- Los Angeles Branch Naacp v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictNinth Circuit· 1985-02-21· cited 118×
- United States v. James A. BohnNinth Circuit· 1992-02-06· cited 104×
Other cases named Carstarphen v. Milsner
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.