Jane Doe v. Allied-Signal, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding suits premised upon different transactions when first suit against employer arose from rape of employee on work premises and second suit arose from employer's misrepresentations about plaintiff's status as an employee
• recognizing Ultramar distinction but also finding that removal was improper because no res judicata was present
• stating that “[c]ourts should interpret the removal statute narrowly and presume that the plaintiff may choose his or her forum.”
• recognizing Ultramar distinction but also finding that removal was improper because no res judicata was present
• “The inquiry, focusing on the facts of a situation, is intended to discover whether the plaintiff could have raised the issue in the first suit”
• \Courts should interpret the removal statute narrowly and presume that the plaintiff may choose his or her forum.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).