Five Star Capital Corp. v. Ruby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the doctrine of issue preclusion prevents parties from relitigating a specific issue that has already been decided on its merits
• recognizing that for issue preclusion to apply, \the initial ruling must have been on the merits and have become final\ (emphasis added)
• holding that one of the requisites for claim preclusion is the 2We reject BoNY's jurisdictional challenge of Chersus appeal; jurisdiction is valid because the challenged order constitutes a special order after final judgment under NRAP 3A(b)(8
• noting that there is \a public policy exception to claim preclusion in cases involving a determination of paternity\
• providing that claim preclusion applies to all grounds of recovery that were or could have been brought in the first case
• recognizing \a public policy exception to claim preclusion in cases involving a determination of paternity\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).