Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Third Circuit· 3/20/2008

Carrascosa v. McGuire

Citations

  • 520 F.3d 249
  • 70 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 149
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 5850
  • 2008 WL 732045

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that an appeal only includes orders issued before the Notice of Appeal is filed
  • finding that the reviewing court lacked jurisdiction because the appellant’s notice of appeal was filed beyond the thirty-day limit
  • finding that the reviewing court had to dismiss an appeal because the appellant’s notice of appeal was filed beyond the thirty-day limit
  • declining to extend comity to Spanish Hague Convention Order refusing to return child to United States because Spanish court departed from fundamentals of Hague Convention by refusing to apply New Jersey law
  • rejecting argument that previous counsel’s failure to file timely notice of appeal could be excused because that argument “seeks essentially equitable relief from the time limit on appeals,” which Bowles precludes
  • where no amended notice of appeal is timely filed, Court lacks jurisdiction to review “arguments raised for the first time” in motion for reconsideration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fuentes, Jordan, O'Neill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Carrascosa v. McGuire

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.