· 1/9/2001
Marina Mezitis Diorinou v. Nicholas H.E. Mezitis
Citations
- 237 F.3d 133
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 266
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a country may not be a child’s habitual residence if, under the Convention, the child had been wrongfully removed to or retained in that country
- stating that “a case-specific inquiry is sometimes appropriate” when determining the propriety of deference to a foreign court ruling
- noting that a country may not be a child’s habitual residence if, under the Convention, the child had been wrongfully removed to or retained in that country
- applying Hilton and concluding that Greek ruling on custody was conclusive as to facts concerning controversy
- discussing factors used in determining whether to extend preclusive effect to a foreign court’s determination
- noting, in this context, that courts frequently refer to their “defer[ence] to the foreign tribunal’s adjudication of the underlying matter [a]s a matter of ‘comity’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman, Kearse, Winter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.