Skip to main content
· 1/9/2001

Marina Mezitis Diorinou v. Nicholas H.E. Mezitis

Citations

  • 237 F.3d 133
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 266

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a country may not be a child’s habitual residence if, under the Convention, the child had been wrongfully removed to or retained in that country
  • stating that “a case-specific inquiry is sometimes appropriate” when determining the propriety of deference to a foreign court ruling
  • noting that a country may not be a child’s habitual residence if, under the Convention, the child had been wrongfully removed to or retained in that country
  • applying Hilton and concluding that Greek ruling on custody was conclusive as to facts concerning controversy
  • discussing factors used in determining whether to extend preclusive effect to a foreign court’s determination
  • noting, in this context, that courts frequently refer to their “defer[ence] to the foreign tribunal’s adjudication of the underlying matter [a]s a matter of ‘comity’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Kearse, Winter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.