Bronshtein v. Horn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the relaxed waiver rule applied to procedural default occurring October 20, 1998
• recognizing that petitioner, whose second PCRA petition was untimely under § 9545(b)(1
• holding it unnecessary to determine whether there was procedural default because “the claims in question lack merit”
• explaining that PCRA’s one-year jurisdictional time bar was firmly established in Pennsylvania at least as early as March 2, 1999
• finding relevant to Batson analysis that the prosecutor “passed up” the opportunity to strike other prospective jurors who were members of the allegedly targeted group
• considering de novo whether habeas petitioner established pri-ma facie case under Batson where state appellate court had incorrectly applied Batson standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).