Asvesta v. Petroutsas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the pendency of an underlying custody action should not affect the resolution of a Hague petition
• denying request 28 1 (quoting 18 U.S.C. § 1961(1)(A), (B)) (cleaned up). “A ‘pattern of racketeering activity’ requires at least two predicate acts of racketeering 2 activity, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1961(1
• denying request for judicial notice where judicial 28 1 ARS (ECF No. 72). On February 25, 2021, Defendant Apria filed a Response in opposition 2 to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 74
• denying request for judicial notice where judicial 28 1 jury materials are not relevant to Defendant’s Motion; (6) the legal authority cited by 2 Plaintiff for permitting discovery does not apply to motions to dismiss; and (7
• denying request for judicial notice where judicial notice would be “unnecessary”
• denying request for judicial notice where judicial notice would be “unnecessary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).