United States Of America, Ex El., Plaintiff v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that 7 the twin aims of the Erie doctrine “favor application of California’s anti-SLAPP 8 statute in federal cases”
• holding that there is no direct conflict between the Federal Rules and §§ 425.16(b) and (c), and that adopting California procedural rules serves the purposes of the Erie doctrine
• holding that 16 there is no direct conflict between the Federal Rules and sections 425.16(b) and (c), and that 17 adopting California procedural rules serves the purposes of the Erie doctrine
• holding that there is no direct conflict 16 between the Federal Rules and §§ 425.16(b) and (c), and that adopting California procedural rules 17 serves the purposes of the Erie doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).