Skip to main content

Cantrell v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 329 S.E.2d 22
  • 229 Va. 387
  • 1985 Va. LEXIS 217

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[a] conflict of interest on the part of the prosecution” violates the Due Process Clause of the Virginia Constitution
  • holding that a private prosecutor may not have a “civil interest in the case”
  • recognizing “[t]he policy arguments advanced by the defendant for a total prohibition of privately employed prosecutors may have a sound basis in considerations of public policy”
  • noting private prosecutor represented family of victim' in a child custody suit against the defendant
  • private prosecutor who has a civil interest in the case “so infects the prosecution with the possibility that private vengeance has been substituted for impartial application of the criminal law, that prejudice to the defendant need not be shown”
  • discussing relevant circumstantial considerations to the issue of identity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Russell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.