Skip to main content
· 5/30/1967

Willis Lansing Ganger v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary, Appellant(two Cases)

Citations

  • 379 F.2d 709
  • 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6186

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that due process was violated when a part-time Commonwealth Attorney had a conflict of interest by prosecuting a defendant for assault while representing the defendant’s wife in a divorce action
  • where constitutional deficiency of conviction arises from conflicting roles of private attorney and prosecutor, harmless error analysis inappropriate
  • state prosecuting attorney represented defendant’s wife in a pending divorce action based upon the same assault
  • “The prosecuting attorney is an officer of the court, holding a quasi judicial position[; her] primary responsibility is essentially judicial — the prosecution of the guilty and the protection of the innocent”
  • conviction violated fundamental fairness assured by due process clause when part-time commonwealth attorney suffered impermissible conflict of interest by prosecuting defendant for criminal assault while simultaneously representing defendant's wife in divorce action
  • violation of due process clause of Fourteenth Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haynsworth, Boreman, Craven

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.