Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 4/14/1999
Commonwealth v. Ellis
Citations
- 429 Mass. 362
- 708 N.E.2d 644
- 1999 Mass. LEXIS 139
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- due process provisions require that prosecutor be disinterested in sense that prosecutor must not be — nor appear to be — influenced in exercise of discretion by personal interests
- “The reimbursement by IFB of an assistant attorney general for his purchase of a computer hard drive and of IFB’s other financial assistance to the division directly related to these indictments are more problematic____”
- “That in the performance of their duties [the Attorney General has] zealously pursued the defendants, as is [his or her] duty within ethical limits, does not make [his or her] involvement improper, in fact or in appearance”
- discussing prosecutor's duty to zealously advocate within ethical limits
- analyzing structure and operation of IFB
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fried, Wilkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Goodridge v. Department of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2003-11-18· cited 186×
- In Re Justices of the Superior Court Department of the Massachusetts Trial CourtFirst Circuit· 2000-07-07· cited 165×
- DutilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2002-05-17· cited 62×
- United States v. PimentalFirst Circuit· 2004-08-30· cited 54×
- Cote-Whitacre v. Department of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2006-03-30· cited 51×
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2018-04-13· cited 46×
- Hambarian v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 2002-06-12· cited 30×
- People v. ParmarCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-01-30· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. HarwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2000-08-16· cited 17×
- Gillespie v. City of NorthamptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2011-07-14· cited 12×
- Maxwell v. AIG Domestic Claims, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2008-09-23· cited 10×
- Sylvester v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-11-16· cited 8×
- Keesling v. BeegleIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-12-21· cited 7×
- United States v. PimentalD. Massachusetts· 2001-02-20· cited 5×
- United States v. MazzolaD. Massachusetts· 2001-11-26· cited 4×
- Shabazz v. ColeD. Massachusetts· 1999-08-24· cited 4×
- In Re Grand Jury ProceedingsD. Massachusetts· 2001-08-07· cited 4×
- Commonwealth v. EllisMassachusetts Superior Court· 1999-08-27· cited 2×
- Carr v. PearmanIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-09-25· cited 1×
- Goodridge v. Department of Public HealthMassachusetts Superior Court· 2002-05-07· cited 1×
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court· 1927-03-14· cited 2,714×
- Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court· 1972-11-14· cited 834×
- Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court· 1987-05-26· cited 815×
- Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.Supreme Court· 1980-04-28· cited 658×
- People v. EubanksCalifornia Supreme Court· 1996-12-23· cited 167×
- United States v. William W. LillyFirst Circuit· 1992-12-04· cited 120×
- People v. ZimmerNew York Court of Appeals· 1980-11-25· cited 119×
- Willis Lansing Ganger v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary, Appellant(two Cases)Fourth Circuit· 1967-05-30· cited 114×
- Commonwealth v. SbordoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-05-01· cited 109×
- Aime v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1993-04-05· cited 101×
- Cantrell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1985-04-26· cited 79×
- Attorney General v. ColletonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1982-12-28· cited 67×
- Commonwealth v. EskridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-03-19· cited 59×
- Commonwealth v. TaborMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1978-12-13· cited 59×
- Sinclair v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-09-14· cited 52×
- Secretary of Administration & Finance v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1975-03-20· cited 47×
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1969-05-02· cited 36×
- Manning v. Municipal Court of the Roxbury DistrictMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1977-04-04· cited 34×
- International Business MacHines Corp. v. BrownC.D. California· 1994-07-14· cited 23×
- Trigones v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1995-07-26· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.