Fordham v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding testimony not inherently incredible where the defendant “intimated that his testimony had changed” because “he had previously feared for his life and had been afraid to tell the truth”
• “Inconsistent statements by a witness go to the weight and sufficiency of the testimony, not the competency of the witness.”
• “Prior inconsistent testimony is a factor in determining the credibility of a witness, but it does not automatically render the witness’ testimony incredible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).