Skip to main content
· 12/5/2005

Candler v. State

Citations

  • 837 N.E.2d 1100
  • 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 2263
  • 2005 WL 3274790

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that statutes of repose prevent stale claims from springing up and surprising parties when the evidence has been lost
  • statute of repose for medical malpractice, G. L. c. 260, § 4, not subject to equitable estoppel or tolling due to fraudulent concealment
  • principle of judicial restraint includes recognition of inability and undesirability of judiciary substituting its notions of correct policy for that of popularly elected Legislature
  • “[W]e are bound by our Supreme Court’s decisions[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vaidik, Sullivan, Friedlander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.