Indiana Supreme Court· 8/26/1999
State v. Walton
Citations
- 715 N.E.2d 824
- 1999 Ind. LEXIS 619
- 1999 WL 662296
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that the Indiana “evidentiary rule preventing evidence of specific acts of untruthfulness must yield to the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right of confrontation”
- restricting attack of witness credibility by evidence of specific instances of the conduct of a witness
- Before trial, Defendant filed a Rape Shield Notice, indicating his intent to present evidence that the complaining witness had made demonstrably false prior allegations of rape.
- prior false allegation of kidnapping admissible
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sullivan, Shepard, Dickson, Selby, Boehm
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. WyrickCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2001-05-04· cited 110×
- Marq Hall v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2015-07-02· cited 72×
- Ian McCullough v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2012-08-27· cited 57×
- Jerry L. Kindred v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2012-09-12· cited 55×
- Oatts v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-01-20· cited 54×
- Clark v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-05-18· cited 41×
- Sallee v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-11-08· cited 39×
- Saunders v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-06-13· cited 31×
- State v. LongSupreme Court of Missouri· 2004-07-01· cited 31×
- State v. RainesMissouri Court of Appeals· 2003-09-09· cited 26×
- Wise v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2015-02-13· cited 23×
- Sallee v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-03-27· cited 21×
- Fugett v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-07-30· cited 20×
- Candler v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-12-05· cited 19×
- Ellis Thomas v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-09-06· cited 17×
- Kirk v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-10-24· cited 16×
- Graham v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-10-24· cited 15×
- State v. BrayNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2003-01-10· cited 14×
- Frank Jacobs v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2015-01-08· cited 13×
- Rhodes v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-07-29· cited 11×
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,040×
- Commonwealth v. BohannonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1978-07-25· cited 176×
- Timberlake v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-30· cited 148×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1989-03-16· cited 146×
- Clinebell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1988-04-22· cited 143×
- Miller v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1989-09-06· cited 100×
- State v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court· 1984-07-16· cited 95×
- Henry Tague v. Thomas Richards and Attorney General of the State of IndianaSeventh Circuit· 1993-08-31· cited 94×
- John Michael Hughes v. Robert RainesNinth Circuit· 1981-04-06· cited 91×
- Little v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1980-12-15· cited 80×
- Stahl v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-09-24· cited 66×
- Randall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1983-11-17· cited 61×
- Coates v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-03-08· cited 60×
- Stewart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1988-12-16· cited 60×
- State v. LeClairCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-12-17· cited 55×
- Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-06-06· cited 55×
- Mullins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-01-04· cited 50×
- State v. GoodrichIndiana Supreme Court· 1987-03-13· cited 39×
- West v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1986-11-17· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.