Court of Appeals of Oregon· 11/25/2015
Campola v. Zekan
Citations
- 275 Or. App. 38
- 362 P.3d 1205
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- act of repeatedly walking in front of petitioner’s restaurant dressed in a rat suit, although “annoying or upsetting”—particularly in the context of a broader dispute—could not give rise to objectively reasonable alarm
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Andnakamoto, Sercombe, Tookey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. RangelOregon Supreme Court· 1999-02-26· cited 185×
- Delgado v. SoudersOregon Supreme Court· 2002-05-16· cited 82×
- Travis v. StrubelCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-10-27· cited 19×
- Osborne v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-01-28· cited 19×
- Swarringim v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-03-17· cited 12×
- Osborne v. FaddenOregon Supreme Court· 2009-05-14· cited 12×
- Falkenstein v. FalkensteinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-07-28· cited 8×
- Jones v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-06-09· cited 8×
- Miley v. MileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-08-13· cited 6×
- McGinnis-Aitken v. BronsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-05-05· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.