McGinnis-Aitken v. Bronson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to consider as “contacts” in the SPO analysis letters that did not contain threats
• stating that “there is no evidence in the record that petitioner was alarmed or concerned by the door knocking — or by anything else respondent did — so as to cause her alarm or concern for her safety or the safety of her family”
• “The legal standards governing the issuance of an SPO are well settled.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).