Osborne v. Fadden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing SPO where contents of some contacts contained “sexual solicitations,” but no threat of harm, and, thus, were not sufficient to cause petitioners reasonable apprehension regarding their personal safety
• a civil conspiracy requires evidence of two or more persons, an object to be accomplished, a meeting of the minds on the object or course of action, one or more unlawful overt acts, and damages as the proximate result thereof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).