Skip to main content
· 3/11/2002

Campiti v. Matesanz

Citations

  • 186 F. Supp. 2d 29
  • 2002 WL 342153

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • collecting cases andnoting, while declining to decide,the question of whether the failure to disclose the unknown criminal conduct of a police officer,who was a witness at the defendant’s trial,was a Bradyviolation
  • assuming without deciding that the failure to disclose information about a police officer’s criminal conduct was a Brady violation and analyzing whether the information would have been material to the verdict against the defendant
  • “Although the Supreme Court has not addressed appellate delay in the due process context, seven of the Courts of Appeals have held that an appellate delay may constitute a due process violation under some circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ponsor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.