First Circuit· 7/2/2007

Pike v. Guarino

Citations

492 F.3d 61
2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 15751
2007 WL 1881301

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that the state waived its exhaustion defense when it stated that it believed that the petitioner was correct in her assertion that the claims had been exhausted
holding statement that “‘petitioner is correct in her assertion that [the] -7- claims presented . . . have been exhausted’” was “unmistakably clear” and could not be resurrected on appeal (alteration in original)
holding, inter alia, that, because the defendant and her boyfriend, the codefendant, had been held for more than a year on separate floors of the facility, their lack of physical proximity had caused his control over her to diminish
acknowledging the “separate and exacting standard applicable to review of a state court’s factual findings”
discussing the “separate and exacting standard applicable to review of a state court’s factual findings”
discussing the “separate and exacting standard applicable to review of a state court’s factual findings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Selya, Tashima

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

79 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

77 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.