Skip to main content
· 9/28/1992

Dorothy J. Listenbee v. City of Milwaukee and Milwaukee City Service Commission

Citations

  • 976 F.2d 348
  • 23 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 762
  • 7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1382
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 23789
  • 1992 WL 237971

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing a party’s motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal as the necessary notice of appeal
  • construing pro se motion for extension of time to appeal as a notice of appeal
  • construing pro se motion for extension of time to appeal as a notice of appeal
  • construing a motion for extension of time to appeal as a notice of appeal
  • motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal construed as notice of appeal
  • “While the legislature may elect not to confer a property interest . . . it may not constitutionally authorize the deprivation of such an interest, once conferred, without appropriate procedural safeguards..”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Easterbrook, Shadur

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.