· 9/28/1992
Dorothy J. Listenbee v. City of Milwaukee and Milwaukee City Service Commission
Citations
- 976 F.2d 348
- 23 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 762
- 7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1382
- 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 23789
- 1992 WL 237971
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing a party’s motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal as the necessary notice of appeal
- construing pro se motion for extension of time to appeal as a notice of appeal
- construing pro se motion for extension of time to appeal as a notice of appeal
- construing a motion for extension of time to appeal as a notice of appeal
- motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal construed as notice of appeal
- “While the legislature may elect not to confer a property interest . . . it may not constitutionally authorize the deprivation of such an interest, once conferred, without appropriate procedural safeguards..”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cummings, Easterbrook, Shadur
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.