Skip to main content
· 2/3/1983

United States v. Sammy Lee Ward, Edward B. Prows, A/K/A Teddy

Citations

  • 696 F.2d 1315
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 30809

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that we customarily treat a late notice of appeal, filed within the 30 days during which an extension is permissible, as a motion for extension of time under Rule 4(b)(4) and remand to the district court
  • noting that we customarily treat a late notice of appeal, filed within the 30 days during which an extension is permissible, as a motion for extension of time under Rule 4(b)(4) and remand to the district court
  • noting that we customarily treat a late notice of appeal, filed within the 30 days during which an extension is permissible, as a motion for extension of time under Rule 4(b)(4) and remand to the district court
  • construing a late notice of appeal, filed within the 30 days during which an extension is permissible, as a motion for extension of time
  • stating in criminal cases, we treat a late notice of appeal, filed within 30 days during which an extension is permissible, as a motion for ex- tension of time that should be decided by the district court
  • pro se petitioner’s letter expressing an intent to appeal and requesting appointment of an attorney satisfies Fed. R. App. P. 3(c)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Godbold, Henderson, Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.