· 2/3/1983
United States v. Sammy Lee Ward, Edward B. Prows, A/K/A Teddy
Citations
- 696 F.2d 1315
- 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 30809
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that we customarily treat a late notice of appeal, filed within the 30 days during which an extension is permissible, as a motion for extension of time under Rule 4(b)(4) and remand to the district court
- noting that we customarily treat a late notice of appeal, filed within the 30 days during which an extension is permissible, as a motion for extension of time under Rule 4(b)(4) and remand to the district court
- noting that we customarily treat a late notice of appeal, filed within the 30 days during which an extension is permissible, as a motion for extension of time under Rule 4(b)(4) and remand to the district court
- construing a late notice of appeal, filed within the 30 days during which an extension is permissible, as a motion for extension of time
- stating in criminal cases, we treat a late notice of appeal, filed within 30 days during which an extension is permissible, as a motion for ex- tension of time that should be decided by the district court
- pro se petitioner’s letter expressing an intent to appeal and requesting appointment of an attorney satisfies Fed. R. App. P. 3(c)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Godbold, Henderson, Clark
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.