Skip to main content

Campbell v. State

Citations

  • 910 S.W.2d 475
  • 1995 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 68
  • 1995 WL 354071

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • hearsay admissible at suppression hearings to show, e.g. , consent, articulable suspicion, or probable cause
  • “A defendant who objects to a general reference to the law of parties in the application paragraph is entitled to increased specificity and to have the law of parties applied to the facts of the case.”
  • hearsay admissible at suppression hearings to show, e.g., consent, articulable suspicion, or probable cause
  • “A defendant who objects to a general reference to the law of parties in the application paragraph is entitled to increased specificity and to have the law of parties applied to the facts of the case.”
  • hearsay is admissible at suppression hearings to demonstrate probable cause to arrest
  • \A defendant who objects to a general reference to the law of parties in the application paragraph is entitled to increased specificity and to have the law of parties applied to the facts of the case.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baird, McCormick, Clinton, Mansfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

94 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.