Calhoon v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “what matters for the purpose of the burglary statute is how the defendant entered the property, not how he exited the property” (emphasis in original)
• observing that Gray involved entry into “a completely enclosed area”
• refusing to apply the statute to area only partially enclosed by a fence
• observ‐ ing that Gray involved entry into “a completely enclosed ar‐ ea”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Perry
  Seventh Circuit· 2017-07-06· cited 16×
• Willie B. Jenkins v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-05-26· cited 10×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McHenry v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2005-01-06· cited 491×
• Davis v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2002-06-25· cited 95×
• McCovens v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1989-06-09· cited 37×
• Joy v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1984-03-08· cited 33×
• Huber v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2004-04-06· cited 26×
• Gray v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2003-10-17· cited 12×