Indiana Court of Appeals· 3/8/1984
Joy v. State
Citations
- 460 N.E.2d 551
- 1984 Ind. App. LEXIS 2389
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “the fence surrounding the Leland Lumber Company was a ‘structure’ as contemplated by our burglary statute”
- holding that “the fence surrounding the Leland Lumber Company was a ‘structure’ as contem‐ plated by our burglary statute”
- holding that fence surrounding lumber yard was structure under burglary statute as its purpose was protecting property within its confines and it was integral part of closed compound
- explaining that “the acts of a confederate in the commission of a crime may be imputed to a defendant who did not personally commit each and every element of the offense”
- where the defendant used wire cutters to cut a fence surrounding a lumber yard
- where the defendant used wire cutters to cut a fence surrounding a lumber yard
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ratliff, Neal, Robertson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bieghler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1985-07-31· cited 201×
- State v. FoulenfontNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-04-27· cited 92×
- Carter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1987-08-25· cited 68×
- McCovens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-06-09· cited 37×
- Holman v. HolmanIndiana Court of Appeals· 1985-01-14· cited 36×
- Gerber v. GerberIndiana Court of Appeals· 1985-04-17· cited 20×
- Whitehead v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1986-11-18· cited 16×
- United States v. PerrySeventh Circuit· 2017-07-06· cited 16×
- Cadiz v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-02-20· cited 15×
- Vestal v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-03-07· cited 15×
- Sweany v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-02-08· cited 14×
- Adams v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1989-06-20· cited 12×
- Gray v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-10-17· cited 12×
- Sutton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1986-07-24· cited 11×
- Graham v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1985-07-31· cited 10×
- People v. ChavezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2012-05-11· cited 7×
- People v. JacquesMichigan Court of Appeals· 1996-03-12· cited 6×
- Leonards v. U-Jin Enterprises, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals· 1991-06-26· cited 6×
- Keramida v. ZachmanoglouIndiana Court of Appeals· 1984-11-20· cited 5×
- Calhoon v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-02-15· cited 5×
Cites
94 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 3,552×
- Loyd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1980-01-11· cited 405×
- Patterson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1975-03-18· cited 344×
- Elmore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1978-11-08· cited 233×
- Emerson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1972-10-18· cited 92×
- Jacks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1979-09-26· cited 82×
- Gradison v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1973-08-14· cited 81×
- Turner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1972-09-26· cited 80×
- Lisenko v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1976-10-15· cited 70×
- Lock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 69×
- Bean v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1978-01-25· cited 66×
- Daniels v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1983-09-09· cited 65×
- Watkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1983-03-17· cited 63×
- State v. RoadhsWashington Supreme Court· 1967-07-27· cited 61×
- Tapp v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1980-06-23· cited 61×
- Woolston v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1983-09-19· cited 61×
- Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1982-12-29· cited 59×
- Morris v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1977-07-07· cited 55×
- Lewis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1982-10-27· cited 55×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.