Skip to main content

Huber v. State

Citations

  • 805 N.E.2d 887
  • 2004 Ind. App. LEXIS 573
  • 2004 WL 728839

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that no direct or indirect contact had been shown to indicate a violation of the protective order where the defendant asked a person to call his wife and that person did not call the wife
  • explaining that “if the evidence is sufficient to support a conviction on appeal, then the trial court’s denial of a Motion for a Directed Verdict cannot be in error”
  • stating that if the evidence is sufficient to support a conviction on appeal, then the trial court’s denial of a motion for a directed verdict cannot be in error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Darden, Bailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.