Curry v. City Of Syracuse

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that plaintiff has “strong incentive and initiative to litigate” question where judicial finding is relevant to incarceration (internal quotation marks omitted)
• observing that an affirmative defense \normally must be pled in a timely manner or it may be waived\
• noting that “credibility assessments, choices between conflicting versions of the events, and the weighing of evidence are matters for the jury, not for the court on a motion for summary judgment”
• noting that “credibility assessments, choices between conflicting versions of the events, and the weighing of evidence are matters for the jury, not for the court on a motion for summary judgment”
• noting that “credibility assessments, choices between conflicting versions of the events, and the weighing of evidence are matters for the jury, not for the court on a motion for summary judgment”
• stating that an 6 issue is “‘decisive in the present action’ if it would prove or disprove, without more, an essential element of any of the claims set forth in the complaint”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).