Rubin Sira v. R. Morton, C. Artuz, D. Selsky, and G. Goord

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “paraphrasing of certain events occurring during parts of the disciplinary hearing” did not incorporate the “hearing transcripts” into the complaint
• holding that error in date of incident deprives the prisoner of due process where it caused actual confusion as to which events formed the basis of the charge
• concluding that documents that the “complaint explicitly refers to and relies upon” and that were “integral to [the plaintiff’s] ability to pursue” his claim were incorporated into the complaint
• concluding that documents that the “complaint explicitly refers to and relies upon” and that were “integral to [the plaintiff’s] ability to pursue” his claim were incorporated into the complaint
• recognizing possibility “that on further development of the record defendants will be able to justify withholding the substance of the informants’ disclosures” from the accused inmate
• noting that a complaint is deemed to include any written instrument attached to the complaint, incorporated by reference, or “integral” to the complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).