Skip to main content

Swan v. State

Citations

  • 28 A.3d 362
  • 2011 Del. LEXIS 486
  • 2011 WL 3904610

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that post-conviction courts may make credibility determinations and according “deference” to finding that post-conviction defendant’s version of events was “not credible” in light of the record
  • observing that Strickland requires that an inmate make both showings – deficient performance and prejudice – and “‘[i]f it is easier to dispose of an ineffectiveness claim on the ground of lack of sufficient prejudice . . . that course should be followed.’”
  • beginning a Strickland analysis with the test's prejudice prong

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steele, Holland, Berger, Jacobs, Ridgely

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.