Skip to main content
· 1/7/1998

Weddington Productions, Inc. v. Flick

Citations

  • 60 Cal. App. 4th 793
  • 60 Cal. App. 2d 793
  • 71 Cal. Rptr. 2d 265
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 218
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 223
  • 1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 9

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Consent [to a compromise settlement] 17 is not mutual, unless the parties all agree upon the same thing in the same sense.” 18 (citation omitted)
  • “If there is no evidence establishing a manifestation of assent to the ‘same thing’ by both parties, then there is no mutual consent to contract and no contract formation.”
  • “If . . . a supposed ‘contract’ 4 does not provide a basis for determining what obligations the parties have agreed to, 5 and hence does not make possible a determination of whether those agreed obligations 6 have been breached, there is no contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zebrowski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.