California Lettuce Growers, Inc. v. Union Sugar Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the fact the amount of damages “maybe uncertain, contingent or difficult of ascertainment does not bar recovery”
• evidence of usage is always admissible to supply a deficiency or as a means of interpretation where it does not alter or vary the terms of the contract
• “[W]here a contract confers on one party a discretionary power affecting the rights of the other, a duty is imposed to exercise that discre- tion in good faith and in accordance with fair dealing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).