Buffington v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \a majority of all sitting judges is required to create precedent\
• “[A] majority of all sitting judges is required to create precedent, and therefore, it follows that a plurality vote does not create a binding result.” (quotation marks omitted)
• “[A] majority of all sitting judges is required to create precedent”
• “It is true that a majority of all sitting judges is required to create precedent[.]” (citing Churchill v. Pearl River Basin Dev. Dist., 619 So. 2d 900, 904 (Miss. 1993), superseded by statute as stated in Maxwell v. Jackson Cnty., 768 So. 2d 900 (Miss. 2000))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).