Skip to main content

State v. Wright

Citations

  • 470 S.E.2d 916
  • 221 Ga. App. 202
  • 1996 Ga. App. LEXIS 431

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that defendant argued that “a police officer is required to have an articulable suspicion before he can commence pursuit or even the mere following of a citizen”
  • noting that defendant argued that “a police officer is required to have an articulable suspicion before he can commence pursuit or even the mere following of a citizen”
  • noting that the cases cited by the defendant “were focused on the intrusion caused by the ultimate detention of the citizen and [were] not authority supporting [the defendant’s] contention” (emphasis supplied)
  • noting that the cases cited by the defendant “were focused on the intrusion caused by the ultimate detention of the citizen and [were] not authority supporting the [defendant’s] contention” (emphasis supplied)
  • \the apprehending officer[ ] `was entitled to rely on the information given him by a fellow officer' in the formation of an articulable suspicion\
  • “the apprehending officer[ ] ‘was entitled to rely on the information given him by a fellow officer’ in the formation of an articulable suspicion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birdsong, Blackburn, Beasley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.