Hann v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding trial court’s reference to “reasonable certainty” did not constitute reversible error where “the charge given as a whole repeatedly and accurately conveyed the concept of reasonable doubt”
• while a motion for new trial is pending, appeals must comply with the interlocutory appeal requirements
• while a motion for new trial is pending, appeals must comply with the interlocutory appeal requirements
• while a motion for new trial is pending, appeals must comply with the interlocutory appeal requirements
• while a motion for new trial is pending, appeals must comply with the interlocutory appeal requirements
• while a motion for new trial is pending, appeals must comply with the interlocutory appeal requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).