Skip to main content

Buffington v. State

Citations

  • 824 So. 2d 576
  • 2002 WL 1340941

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that \a majority of all sitting judges is required to create precedent\
  • “[A] majority of all sitting judges is required to create precedent, and therefore, it follows that a plurality vote does not create a binding result.” (quotation marks omitted)
  • “[A] majority of all sitting judges is required to create precedent”
  • “It is true that a majority of all sitting judges is required to create precedent[.]” (citing Churchill v. Pearl River Basin Dev. Dist., 619 So. 2d 900, 904 (Miss. 1993), superseded by statute as stated in Maxwell v. Jackson Cnty., 768 So. 2d 900 (Miss. 2000))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: En Banc

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.