Skip to main content

Bryant v. State

Citations

  • 574 A.2d 29
  • 83 Md. App. 237
  • 1990 Md. App. LEXIS 99

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the simple and frequently neglected truth is that the defense of self-defense applies to assaultive crimes generally”
  • “In any event, it seems clear that the possible effect of voluntary intoxication upon a particular specific intent is quintessentially a question of fact for the jury, properly instructed.”
  • “Statutory maiming, under Article 27, § 385, is ... indisputably a specific intent crime”
  • “Imperfect self-defense is an aspect of homicide law and nothing more. Outside of homicide law, the concept doesn’t exist.... With respect to all other crimes, the defendant is either guilty or not guilty. He either acted in self-defense or he did not. There is no ‘in between.’ ”
  • self-defense applicable to assault crimes generally

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moylan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.