Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 6/1/1990
Bryant v. State
Citations
- 574 A.2d 29
- 83 Md. App. 237
- 1990 Md. App. LEXIS 99
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “the simple and frequently neglected truth is that the defense of self-defense applies to assaultive crimes generally”
- “In any event, it seems clear that the possible effect of voluntary intoxication upon a particular specific intent is quintessentially a question of fact for the jury, properly instructed.”
- “Statutory maiming, under Article 27, § 385, is ... indisputably a specific intent crime”
- “Imperfect self-defense is an aspect of homicide law and nothing more. Outside of homicide law, the concept doesn’t exist.... With respect to all other crimes, the defendant is either guilty or not guilty. He either acted in self-defense or he did not. There is no ‘in between.’ ”
- self-defense applicable to assault crimes generally
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moylan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2001-06-19· cited 64×
- Richmond v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-04-26· cited 63×
- Jones v. MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-02-07· cited 46×
- State v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-05-30· cited 46×
- Roach v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-04-13· cited 33×
- Robertson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-12-02· cited 24×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-07-03· cited 15×
- State v. O'RearSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-02-17· cited 13×
- Bussie v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-05-01· cited 10×
- Ford v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-04-01· cited 10×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-05-07· cited 8×
- Stevenson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-09-06· cited 6×
- In Re Lavar D.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-12-30· cited 4×
- Dashiell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-11-04· cited 4×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-01-09· cited 660×
- Newton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-05-05· cited 189×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-07-17· cited 171×
- Shell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-07-24· cited 125×
- Hook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-02-13· cited 124×
- State v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-11-21· cited 109×
- Bedford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-11-29· cited 77×
- Mills v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-06-25· cited 69×
- State v. GoverCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1973-01-09· cited 67×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1979-01-26· cited 52×
- Gray v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1979-07-16· cited 46×
- Shuck v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-11-26· cited 32×
- State v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-08-03· cited 31×
- Jenkins v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-07-13· cited 26×
- Fairbanks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-12-06· cited 21×
- Law v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-12-30· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.