· 11/4/2009
Lovitt v. State
Citations
- 915 N.E.2d 1040
- 2009 Ind. App. LEXIS 2344
- 2009 WL 3643481
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no error in excluding prior consistent statement; witness already had motive to fabricate when she made the statement
- analyzing 10 Ind. Evidence Rule 801(d)(1)(B)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mathias, Darden, Robb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.