Indiana Supreme Court· 1/6/2000
Bacher v. State
Citations
- 722 N.E.2d 799
- 2000 Ind. LEXIS 3
- 2000 WL 35807
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “[b]ecause a single valid aggravating factor is adequate to justify a sentence enhancement, the sentencing court did not abuse its discretion in enhancing the defendant’s sentence”
- holding when a sentencing court improperly applies an aggravating circumstance, but other valid aggravating circumstances do exist, a sentence enhancement may still be upheld
- explaining that a trial court may properly consider as an aggravating circumstance prior arrests and pending charges not reduced to convictions because they reflect the defendant’s character and indicate a risk of future crime
- noting fact that defendant was in a “position of trust” with the victim was a valid aggravating circumstance
- finding a sentence may be upheld despite a single incorrect aggravating factor, if other aggravating factors are present
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dickson, Shepard, Boehm, Rucker, Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McElroy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2007-05-02· cited 177×
- Bryant v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-01-29· cited 76×
- Georgopolus v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-09-29· cited 49×
- Davies v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-06-15· cited 44×
- Sargent v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-11-07· cited 39×
- Johnson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-08-29· cited 33×
- Jose Guzman v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2013-04-15· cited 33×
- Nelson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-07-31· cited 26×
- Berry v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-12-16· cited 24×
- Weis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-04-20· cited 23×
- Hull v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-12-30· cited 23×
- Cruz Angeles v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-07-16· cited 23×
- Hart v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-06-07· cited 22×
- Bostick v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-03-04· cited 21×
- Borton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-11-30· cited 20×
- Sipple v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-05-15· cited 17×
- Patrick v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-12-23· cited 16×
- Means v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-05-06· cited 15×
- Vazquez v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-12-30· cited 15×
- Caron v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-03-31· cited 15×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hammons v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 174×
- Widener v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-12-28· cited 125×
- Bacher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-10-09· cited 117×
- Morgan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-12-31· cited 115×
- Blanche v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-01-29· cited 105×
- Edgecomb v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-11-01· cited 98×
- Archer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-02-18· cited 96×
- Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-11· cited 76×
- Harris v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-12-28· cited 75×
- Tunstill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1991-03-21· cited 69×
- Carter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-10-10· cited 64×
- Wilkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1986-12-03· cited 40×
- Owens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-10-20· cited 39×
- Beason v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-01-13· cited 38×
- Gibson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-12-07· cited 33×
- Martin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-03-06· cited 32×
- Wray v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-12-13· cited 28×
- Crawley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-03-26· cited 27×
- Cooper v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-11-25· cited 21×
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-09-17· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.