Skip to main content

Bacher v. State

Citations

  • 722 N.E.2d 799
  • 2000 Ind. LEXIS 3
  • 2000 WL 35807

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[b]ecause a single valid aggravating factor is adequate to justify a sentence enhancement, the sentencing court did not abuse its discretion in enhancing the defendant’s sentence”
  • holding when a sentencing court improperly applies an aggravating circumstance, but other valid aggravating circumstances do exist, a sentence enhancement may still be upheld
  • explaining that a trial court may properly consider as an aggravating circumstance prior arrests and pending charges not reduced to convictions because they reflect the defendant’s character and indicate a risk of future crime
  • noting fact that defendant was in a “position of trust” with the victim was a valid aggravating circumstance
  • finding a sentence may be upheld despite a single incorrect aggravating factor, if other aggravating factors are present

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dickson, Shepard, Boehm, Rucker, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.