Skip to main content

Bryant v. State

Citations

  • 721 P.2d 364
  • 102 Nev. 268
  • 721 P.2d 721
  • 1986 Nev. LEXIS 1302

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a guilty plea is presumptively valid and a petitioner carries the burden of establishing that the plea was not entered knowingly and intelligently
  • holding that reviewing court should look to the totality of the circumstances to determine if a guilty plea is valid
  • holding that claims challenging the validity of the plea should be raised SUPREME COURT OF in a post-conviction petition or a motion to withdraw a guilty plea
  • holding that a defendant’s one and only appeal of a conviction by entry of guilty plea or of the ineffectiveness of trial counsel is through state post-conviction proceedings
  • stating that this court will not reverse a district court's determination concerning the validity of a plea absent an abuse of discretion
  • stating that this court will not reverse a district court’s determination concerning the validity of a plea absent an abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.