Skip to main content

Hogan v. State

Citations

  • 732 P.2d 422
  • 103 Nev. 21
  • 1987 Nev. LEXIS 1577

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a district court does not abuse its discretion by prohibiting repetitive questions
  • explaining that the court may exclude questions that are not directed at acquiring information about the veniremembers ability to be fair and impartial or are \aimed more at indoctrination than acquisition of information\
  • victim’s hearsay statement was excited utterance because made shortly after defendant threatened to kill her and while she was still frightened by it
  • upholding a statement made one hour after the threat

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.