Skip to main content

Hubbard v. State

Citations

  • 877 P.2d 519
  • 110 Nev. 671

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that statutory requirements that the same jury and judge would hear the trial and sentencing stages in a death penalty case were procedural and not jurisdictional
  • explaining that the “court 25 has held that a guilty plea is presumptively valid, and the defendant has the burden of 26 establishing that the plea was not entered knowingly and intelligently”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.