Nevada Supreme Court· 6/14/2000

Hart v. State

Citations

1 P.3d 969
1 Nev. 558
116 Nev. Adv. Rep. 66
2000 Nev. LEXIS 76

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that post-conviction challenges to a guilty plea could be brought as a motion to withdraw guilty plea or as a habeas petition
concluding that there is no fundamental fairness exception to a jurisdictional statute
recognizing the availability of a post-conviction motion to withdraw a guilty plea
considering whether inexcusable delay or implied waiver due to defendant’s knowing acquiescence to plea proceeding prevented a finding of manifest injustice warranting withdrawal of the plea
implying, in dicta, that district court’s failure to advise a defendant that he was ineligible for probation did not warrant reversal because defendant pleading guilty to murder could not reasonably expect that the offense was probational
\[C]onsideration of the equitable doctrine of laches is necessary in determining whether a defendant has shown 'manifest injustice' that would permit withdrawal of a plea after sentencing.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.