Michigan Court of Appeals· 5/15/1989
Brunson v. E & L TRANSPORT CO.
Citations
- 441 N.W.2d 48
- 177 Mich. App. 95
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying prejudgment interest from date of complaint to date of recovery under Elliott-Larsen Act
- affirming award of $80,000 for emotional distress based on plaintiff’s testimony
- Evidence to support an $80,000 award for emotional distress was \found in the long history and obvious pattern of gender discrimination practiced upon plaintiff by defendant\
- “Evidence that the defendant engaged in a long-term campaign or pattern of harassment or discrimination may properly be considered” because “[s]uch evidence may constitute relevant background information illuminating later practices and, thus, revealing discriminatory motives.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Banhof, Beasley, MacKenzie
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Robert Lilley, Cross-Appellee v. Btm Corporation, Cross-AppellantSixth Circuit· 1992-04-29· cited 208×
- Duane Moody v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Company, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1990-11-06· cited 146×
- Campbell v. Department of Human ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals· 2009-11-24· cited 59×
- Reisman v. Regents of Wayne State UniversityMichigan Court of Appeals· 1991-04-16· cited 58×
- Howard v. Canteen Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals· 1992-01-15· cited 53×
- Meek v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals· 1992-03-25· cited 27×
- Milan Chonich Carmen Pascaretti v. Wayne County Community College Juanita C. FordSixth Circuit· 1992-10-16· cited 25×
- DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL RIGHTS Ex Rel JOHNSON v. SILVER DOLLAR CAFEMichigan Supreme Court· 1992-09-29· cited 16×
- Wolff v. Automobile ClubMichigan Court of Appeals· 1992-04-21· cited 14×
- Paulitch v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals· 1995-02-21· cited 14×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court· 1947-05-05· cited 2,636×
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court· 1982-06-28· cited 1,769×
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 1,404×
- Ray v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court· 1978-03-06· cited 588×
- Michigan Canners & Freezers Assn., Inc. v. Agricultural Marketing and Bargaining Bd.Supreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 296×
- Jenkins v. Southeastern Michigan Chapter, American Red CrossMichigan Court of Appeals· 1985-04-15· cited 129×
- Sumner v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court· 1986-12-30· cited 113×
- Civil Rights Commission v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals· 1977-12-27· cited 61×
- Taylor v. Wyeth Laboratories, IncMichigan Court of Appeals· 1984-12-04· cited 41×
- Riethmiller v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Court of Appeals· 1986-04-22· cited 41×
- Om-El Export Co., Inc. v. NEWCORMichigan Court of Appeals· 1986-09-09· cited 31×
- Dixon v. W W Grainger, IncMichigan Court of Appeals· 1987-12-28· cited 28×
- Kochoian v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals· 1988-04-18· cited 20×
- Bell v. MerrittMichigan Court of Appeals· 1982-07-21· cited 18×
- Murphy v. Muskegon CountyMichigan Court of Appeals· 1987-09-08· cited 18×
- Harvey v. Security Services, IncMichigan Court of Appeals· 1986-01-07· cited 16×
- Pomranky v. Zack Co.Michigan Court of Appeals· 1987-04-20· cited 16×
- Thomas v. Michigan Employment Security CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals· 1986-09-16· cited 9×
- Michigan Canners & Freezers Ass'n v. Agricultural Marketing & Bargaining BoardMichigan Supreme Court· 1982-12-23· cited 6×
- DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL RIGHTS Ex Rel LANPHAR v. a & C CARRIERSMichigan Court of Appeals· 1987-02-03· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.