Skip to main content
· 3/25/1992

Meek v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.

Citations

  • 483 N.W.2d 407
  • 193 Mich. App. 340

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that prong one was satisfied where all alleged acts of discrimination involved “gender and religion”
  • finding that a claim “clearly” misses the extreme and outrageous threshold where employees berated their colleague by calling her “chubby” and “ugly,” asking “who she had slept with to get her job,” and insulting her religion
  • recognizing race-based, hostile-environment action under the Civil Rights Act
  • recognizing race-based, hostileenvironment action under the Civil Rights Act
  • cruel sexist remarks and religious degradation from supervisor to female employee was not extreme and outrageous conduct
  • cruel sexist remarks and religious degradation from supervisor to female employee was not extreme and outrageous conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jansen, Wahls, Hood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.