Skip to main content
· 9/16/1986

Thomas v. Michigan Employment Security Commission

Citations

  • 398 N.W.2d 514
  • 154 Mich. App. 736

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • res judicata bars subsequent action only where prior action was between the same parties and the same matter was litigated
  • “The inclusion of the term ‘without prejudice’ in a judgment of dismissal ordinarily indicates the absence of a decision on the merits, and leaves the parties free to litigate the matter in a subsequent action, as though the dismissed action had not been commenced.”
  • “The inclusion of the term ‘without prejudice’ in a judgment of dismissal ordinarily indicates the absence of a decision on the merits, and leaves the parties free to litigate the matter in a subsequent action, as though the dismissed action had not been commenced.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepherd, Kelly, Tahvonen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.