Court of Appeals of Maryland· 11/12/1997

Lovell v. State

Citations

702 A.2d 261
347 Md. 623
1997 Md. LEXIS 555

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that the increased value of property acquired during the marriage is marital property, unless it can be directly traced to a non-marital source
holding that a trial court has a duty to instruct “in response to a jury’s question concerning a matter that the jury is required to consider.”
holding that a trial court has a duty to instruct “in response to a jury’s question concerning a matter that the jury is required to consider.”
holding that a trial court has a duty to instruct “in response to a jury’s question concerning a matter that the jury is required to consider.”
stating that the Court in Priet “held” that “[i]t may be appropriate to presume that in most cases defense counsel routinely explain the nature of the offense”
stating that the Court in Priet \ held \ that \[i]t may be appropriate to presume that in most cases defense counsel routinely explain the nature of the offense\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rodowsky, Wilner, Chasanow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

75 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.