Supreme Court of Delaware· 10/30/1991
Jarvis v. State
Citations
- 600 A.2d 38
- 1991 Del. LEXIS 356
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding passenger had no standing to object to the stop of the car, but had standing to object to the circumstances under which her person was seized
- holding passenger had no standing to object to the stop of the car, but had standing to object to the circumstances under which her person was seized
- finding that passenger had standing to object to the circumstances under which her person was seized where she was detained as result of the stop, even though she did not own the vehicle, exercise any control over it, or have any reasonable expectation of privacy in it
- probable cause existed although several actions were subject to innocent explanations
- probable cause existed although several actions were subject to innocent explanations
- “While reasonable suspicion will support a limited search and seizure, it does not justify an arrest. Only probable cause provides the police the authority to intrude into an individual’s privacy to that extent.” (citing 11 Del. C. § 1904(b)(1
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Christie, Walsh, Holland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Delaware· 1993-05-21· cited 87×
- Woody v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2001-01-24· cited 84×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2015-06-17· cited 38×
- Rybicki v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2015-07-20· cited 30×
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2002-06-13· cited 28×
- Hovington v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1992-11-30· cited 20×
- Flowers v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2018-09-27· cited 19×
- People v. BrendlinCalifornia Supreme Court· 2006-06-29· cited 18×
- State v. HuntleySuperior Court of Delaware· 2000-05-23· cited 15×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2001-10-23· cited 14×
- State v. BowersSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1998-10-08· cited 10×
- Chisholm v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2010-02-04· cited 9×
- Lambert v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2015-02-12· cited 8×
- Quartarone v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware· 2009-02-02· cited 7×
- Watson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2005-11-28· cited 3×
- State of Delaware v. Massas.Superior Court of Delaware· 2015-04-24
- State of Delaware v. Howard.Superior Court of Delaware· 2015-11-16
- State of Delaware v. Mykal DempsterSuperior Court of Delaware· 2016-02-26
- State of Delaware v. Anthony L. DaleSuperior Court of Delaware· 2016-04-19
- State v. BennefieldSuperior Court of Delaware· 2016-09-30
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-06-10· cited 3,146×
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 2,425×
- United States v. EdwardsSupreme Court· 1974-03-26· cited 917×
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Williams, Frederico, in No. 83-3480 v. Ayala, Jorge, in No. 83-3481 v. Guadalupe, Leocadio, in No. 83-3501Third Circuit· 1984-07-24· cited 70×
- Fiduciary Trust Co. v. Fiduciary Trust Co.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1982-04-20· cited 70×
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1988-03-28· cited 34×
- State v. CochranSupreme Court of Delaware· 1977-03-08· cited 17×
- Freeman v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1974-03-15· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.