Skip to main content

Jarvis v. State

Citations

  • 600 A.2d 38
  • 1991 Del. LEXIS 356

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding passenger had no standing to object to the stop of the car, but had standing to object to the circumstances under which her person was seized
  • holding passenger had no standing to object to the stop of the car, but had standing to object to the circumstances under which her person was seized
  • finding that passenger had standing to object to the circumstances under which her person was seized where she was detained as result of the stop, even though she did not own the vehicle, exercise any control over it, or have any reasonable expectation of privacy in it
  • probable cause existed although several actions were subject to innocent explanations
  • probable cause existed although several actions were subject to innocent explanations
  • “While reasonable suspicion will support a limited search and seizure, it does not justify an arrest. Only probable cause provides the police the authority to intrude into an individual’s privacy to that extent.” (citing 11 Del. C. § 1904(b)(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Christie, Walsh, Holland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.