Skip to main content

Brown v. State

Citations

  • 290 S.W.3d 247
  • 2009 WL 385385

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that involuntary intoxication is not a defense to DWI
  • holding no involuntary intoxication when appellant took Ambien instead of his blood pressure medicine when the Ambien pills were a different color and shape than his blood pressure medicine
  • holding no involuntary intoxication when appellant took Ambien instead of his blood pressure medicine when the Ambien pills were a different color and shape than his blood pressure medicine
  • because DWI requires no culpable mental state \defense of involuntary intoxication is not relevant\
  • because DWI requires no culpable mental state “defense of involuntary intoxication is not relevant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Livingston, Dauphinot, McCoy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.