Skip to main content

Rodriguez v. State

Citations

  • 758 S.W.2d 787
  • 1988 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 186
  • 1988 WL 107820

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • if error exists and was preserved, reversal required if error caused “some harm” to appellant from the error
  • “if no proper objection was made at trial and the accused must claim that the error was ‘fundamental,’ he will obtain a reversal only if the error is so egregious and created such harm that he ‘has not had a fair and impartial trial’—in short ‘egregious harm.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clinton, Onion, Teague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

124 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.